I
love TV. I’ve spent time with TV. I’ve had dinners with TV. I even once
proposed to TV (it was super awkward: after I popped the question, it cut to
one of those “No Means No” PSAs and we haven’t spoken about it since.)
But
I think TV could be improved. Here’s my “Top 10 TV Shows I Would Change for the
Better” List. The changes could be as small as changing the font used for the
logo or as big as replacing the entire cast with coked up cats. Let’s find out
how I would ruin improve various television shows!
10)
Eureka
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: A science-fiction
show where the local sheriff must solve the problems of the secret town of
super geniuses before they accidentally kill everyone or erase them from time
or stuff.
What
would I change: Make it dumber.
Eureka
is one of my guilty pleasures. I love watching it, but I sometimes feel bad
doing so. Eureka uses science for spectacle, not as of enlightening the
audience. That’s fine. I’m not expecting Eureka to be Carl Sagan, but the
problem comes from them making all the smart science person stupid and all
science experiments as the writers’ deus ex machina.
Here’s
the basic plot of each episode: Sheriff Carter, the only character in the show
that isn’t a genius, is going about his rounds, interacting with people, when
suddenly, some scientist’s experiment goes wrong. Carter has no idea what’s
going on, but once another scientist explains it to him, Carter uses his folksy
wisdom in the form of a metaphor to somehow solve a problem that a think tank
town could not solve, and everything returns to the status quo. I get that if
Carter couldn’t solve all of the problems, the show’s main character would be
expendable, but it’s like if I walked into Microsoft and using my folksy
wisdom, I was able to fix everything they’re doing wrong; I just can’t suspend
my disbelief that far.
The
other problem is that the writers use science to do whatever the hell they
want. There was a character that was autistic. Not anymore! Poof! Someone
travelled through time, and for some reason, that caused the character to not
be autistic. Why? Because the writers didn’t want to go through the trouble of
writing for an autistic kid, but they seem comfortable writing for a generic,
angsty teenager, thus robbing the character of his uniqueness. Eureka does this
sort of thing frequently to change specific characters or remove/add plots
whenever they want.
Getting
to the point, Eureka should drop the charade and embrace their stupidity.
They’re on a network that spells “sci-fi” as “Sy-Fy” for goodness sake! Sure,
we’re going against Kirk Lazarus’ advice, but they should just go full retard anyway. Have Carter turn
into Chuck and know everything. Have the scientists interact with themselves
from parallel universe. Why do ridiculous stuff with science but still pretend
there’s a line somewhere?
9)
Pee Wee’s Playhouse
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: It was a show for
children where Pee-Wee Herman has wacky adventures in his house with a variety
of colorful characters.
What
would I change: Make it
darker/more adult
The
Pee-Wee franchise is amazingly flexible: it started off as an adult stage show,
it then became a weird/creepy Tim Burton movie, and then finally became a
cheerful children’s show. I can’t think of any show/movie/character that went
through that many tone changes.
I
love dark comedy. I also love adult comedy presented as children’s (ex. South
Park, Conker’s Bad Fur Day) and Pee-Wee’s Playhouse seems like the perfect show
to be turned into a children’s show for adults. Who wouldn’t want to see a
toilet with eyes and a mouth spouting potty language?
8)
Odd Couple
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: Two divorced men,
one clean the other a slob, trying to live together
What
would I change: Turn one of them
into a serial killer and the other into the cop trying to catch him but neither
one realizes what the other one really is.
If
I’m remaking the Odd Couple, I’m doing it my
way. It’s still a sitcom with a live audience/canned laughter. Except, it’d
tackle darker themes through the levity of a sitcom. For example, Oscar has
killed a man in the kitchen and is covered in blood. He leaves the kitchen and
he’s surprised to see Felix back from work so soon. Felix asks about Oscar’s
stains. Oscar lies and explains that he’s making spaghetti and he accidentally
spilled tomato sauce all over himself. Felix goes in and tastes it and
complains that there’s too much iron. Cue the canned laughter.
See?
It’s brilliant and practically writes itself.
7)
Ally McBeal
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: A young lawyer
trying to find love in her busy city life
What
would I change: Make Ally McBeal suffer
a lot
I
could not stand Ally at all. I can relate to her trying to find that special
someone, but after watching nearly three seasons of the show, I realized that
she’s that crazy woman we all know. You know, the one who wants a nice,
interesting, funny guy, but when he does show up, she verbally abuses him and
laments how she’ll never find him and then she acts highly emotional/irrational
and gets upset when everyone’s angry at her for acting crazy. It’s like my
Facebook home page during high school.
She’s
not even interesting as a character. I don’t really like a lot of the
characters on Mad Men as people, but I at least find them interesting enough to
keep watching. Ally just annoys me. Her whole world pisses me off because it’s
shallow and cheap. I love the musical Pippin. They used the song “Finale” from
it for an episode where a character dies, and gospel choir sings the song,
reflecting on the character’s life. My jaw dropped.
Do you know what the
song’s about? In the musical, the Leading Player and his band of performers
are telling Pippin that if he lights himself on fire, he’ll be special. The
song is about trying to convince someone to commit suicide. But not in the
world of Ally McBeal, where the only lyrics they hear are “think about your
life.”
The
only time I enjoy the show is when Ally is suffering, so why not just make the
show that? We just watch Ally’s life getting worse and worse, until she figures
out to not be crazy and shallow.
Look
at that! I took an average TV show and turned it into a Greek tragedy! I earned
my gold star sticker today.
6)
Two and a Half Men
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: Charlie Sheen being
a womanizer with two cardboard cutouts, except Charlie is replaced with Aston
Kutcher who does stuff or whatever I don’t know man.
What
would I change: Replacing the
entire cast with coked up cats
But
Seriously, what would I change: Cancel
it.
I’ve
seen an episode or two on a plane, and unlike the Internet, I didn’t hate it. I
didn’t loathe it, or abhor it, or even scorn it. It was a mediocre, average
show, whose episode content I immediately forgot about after getting off of the
plane. So why do I want it cancelled? Because it’s merely mediocre, but it has
so much success and there is nothing I hate more than something being
successful without doing something risky or different.
I
can forgive The Room for being bad, but you at least remember lines/scenes from
it, right? I can’t say that about Two and a Half Men.
5)
The Spectacular Spider-man
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: The best goddamn
spider-man tv show
What
would I change: Not cancel it
I
loved the show. It was like the old 1990s Spider-Man TV show, except it’s great
without the nostalgia glasses. From what I understand, the show wound up being
cancelled for political reasons and we wound up with…Ultimate Spider-Man.
*shudders*
Spectacular
Spider-Man was funny when it wanted, and dramatic when it needed to be. It even
had a unique look to it. It was Spider-Man through and through unlike…Ultimate
Spider-Man with its faux anime style, humor that’s trying too hard, and flat
drama and why the hell is Spider-Man part of a team!? It’s not called
“Spider-Man and Friends” dammit! But, I digress.
Spectacular-Spiderman
was a show that was not only cut before it’s prime, but was replaced with a
soulless imposter, like the time Barney Gumble showed up to Kamp Krusty as
Krusty the Klown.
Except
it was more disappointing.
4)
Pokémon
Image from Pokemon Wikipedia |
What
was it about: A kid trying to be
the very best, like no one ever was. To catch them was his test; to train him
was his cause.
What
would I change: Make Ash a living
legend
They
pretty much laid out Ash’s goals in the opening theme song. Ash wanted:
#1-
To be the best Pokémon trainer
#2-
To catch all of the Pokémon for Prof. Oak’s Pokédex
But
he doesn’t do either of these things. Sure he gets new Pokémon (primarily by
becoming “friends” instead of beating the crap out of them with his other Pokémon
and then catching them like a normal trainer would) but he keeps swapping out
his roster and even releasing some of his Pokémon. Basically, Ash’s roster is
of a bunch of Pokémon at level 30, and one Pikachu whose level is a number that
we haven’t named yet.
I
get that he’s twelve, but even when I played the first game at eight, I
understood that I need to have a diverse team of 6-12 Pokémon that are each a
high enough level to stand a chance against the Elite Four. Red, the parallel
version of Ash from Pokémon Gold & Silver understood the concept, but
lacked the ambition I’m envisioning.
In
my version of Pokémon, Ash wouldn’t be Simple
Jack retarded, he’d at least be competent enough to understand my strategy
I developed at age eight, and Ash would have accomplished his goal of being the
very best after the second season. The seasons after that would be him and his
small team of Pokémon personally destroying Team Rocket, catching whatever Pokémon
he needed to complete his Pokédex (yes, including legendaries) and being an all
around boss.
Then
he’d beat Gary and then kill him with his Chairzard. Fuck Gary.
3)
Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: Aaron Sorkin dramedy
about a live sketch comedy show
What
would I change: Not make it
political
I
was in love with the pilot for Studio 60…then I loved some of the early
episodes…then I liked the episodes…by the end I hated the show because it
promised me to be an Aaron Sorkin dramedy about sketch comedy and ended up
being an Aaron Sorkin dramedy about politics, disguised as a dramedy about
sketch comedy. It’s like Aaron Sorkin was trying to change the show into what
was best for him, not what was best for the show.
It
started out great: Matthew Perry was in a role meant for him, Bradley Whitford
was fantastic, in fact the whole cast was awesome. All Sorkin had to do was not
fuck it up. That was all. If the show had remained what it was at the pilot,
but not quite as great, it’d still have been great. But instead what happened
was that Sorkin kept adding in more and more politics into the show into that’s
all we had.
If
I wanted to watch a dumbed down version of the West Wing, I would have just
Googled the porn parody where everyone is walking, talking, and fucking quickly.
2)
30 rock
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: Tina Fey tries to
run a fake sketch comedy show at NBC
What
would I change: Make it a cop
drama
I
love 30 Rock, and I don’t really think I could improve anything without
changing what makes the show…the show, I figured I’d do something completely
different. Imagine: another cop drama on NBC with the cast of 30 Rock in
similar roles (Jack Donaghy as the police captain nearing retirement/promotion,
Liz Lemon is the head detective, Jenna and Tracy are partners that don’t play
by the rules, Kenneth is the helpful cadet, etc.).
Instead
of being a show making jabs at NBC, the show itself would be a parody of NBC’s
own lineup, with celebrity cameos as police officers and crack dealers and dead
people. I always felt [insert name of hated celebrity] was born to play the
role of a dead hooker on a Tina Fey cop drama parody.
1)
Friends
Image from Wikipedia |
What
was it about: A sitcom about 6
friends having fun in New York
What
would I change: Make everyone a
pedophile except Joey
I
loved Friends, I did. But like I always say, “If it ain’t broke, break it.”
Sociopaths have their own shows (ex. Dexter, Breaking Bad, Keeping Up With The
Kardashians), why not pedophiles? Friends would be the perfect show to retool
to show the world that pedophiles are normal people like you or me (except for
the child molesting part).
Besides,
I just like the idea of one of the biggest shows in television history being
about pedophiles so I can reference its success to depress anyone who’s
annoying me with his positive view of humanity.
Try
to tell me that if there was a scene where Chandler is talking about a hot
piece of ass and when Joey leans in and asks who he’s talking about and
Chandler says the boy down the hall and Joey’s eyes pop out and he runs away as
the laugh track plays that you’re not smiling just a bit. I fucking dare you.
No comments:
Post a Comment